I was pretty good at Maths at school, but I just can’t seem
to make head or tail of these numbers. There seems to be a $ 3
Million loss occurring in most businesses, and this cost 'hole'
does not show up on any Annual P & L.
What is the cost in question? It is the unrealised return from
the $ 6 million dollars invested in meetings each year (for a 1000
person organisation)
Until now no-one has presented a business case for improvement.
Fortunately, 2 areas of low cost investment create immediate improvement
in the ROI of business meetings. These will plug your $ 3 million
hole and also add significant value through a meeting process
that generates consistently high value adding outcomes.
The Missing $ 3 million dollars
First, let's look at the sums.
The costs
The average employee spends 10 to 25% of their working week in
meetings. If an average salary is $A 65,000.00, this equates
to $A 6.7mil dollars for a 1000 person firm. (see Table 2; Bottom
of article)
The return
Whilst the value of meeting outputs is more difficult to measure,
compelling survey results indicate that most meetings generate
only 50% of their potential value.
A survey of cross function, all level employees from 5 corporate
organisations reveal that..
- only 40% deliver clearly agreed decisions that people are committed
to implementing.
- half of all meetings fail to harness the best ideas and experience
of all participants
- up to 30% of meetings did not require their participation
Of the $ 6.7 Mil dollar investment, a minimum of $ 3 Mil is lost
in unfulfilled productivity.
Does this apply to you?
For a quick review of how your meetings are performing, answer
the 6 questions from your own experience in Table 1 below.
Table 1; Survey of Meeting Effectiveness
"At least half the meetings I attend..." |
Answer true of false |
| "do not deliver clear decisions, or a process for decision
making" |
T F |
| "do not inspire, energise or excite me about the topic
at hand" |
T F |
| "do not require my attendance" |
T F |
| "fail to harness the best ideas, experience and knowledge
of all participants" |
T F |
| "get bogged down or sidetracked without following a clear
process" |
T F |
| "do not have all the right stakeholders required for
decision making" |
T F |
Why are meetings no longer effective?
So, what is happening in meetings and why are they no longer as
effective?
Until now, meetings have been run along traditional lines, because
leaders have assumed these approaches are still working.
However, demands on people outside the meeting room have heightened
their needs for faster decision making, higher participation, and
increased alignment across a wider range of stakeholders.
New skills and methods of running meetings haven't been available
to leaders, beyong generic leadership development programs.
And the structure of meetings has remained geared around 'command'
and 'control', despite leaders best efforts to facilitate participation.
Just picturing the traditional board room table conjures images
of a stifled set of corporate dynamics.
Where to Start
Fortunately, there are 2 areas that present opportunities for
immediate improvement at low cost.
1. Meetings as a Process - Make it FAST
Planning and conducting meetings as a process rather than an event
enables a consistent set of meeting practices to be adopted across
an organisation. A meeting process such as FAST guides leaders
along more productive paths, and still allows for creativity and
variance required in different circumstances
2. Achieving value adding outcomes - Deliver RLA
An effective meeting process delivers higher value outcomes from
all meetings. By simultaneously achieving Relationship, Learning
and Alignment type outcomes, this results in higher levels of
engagement and follow through after meetings.
Let us look at how these 2 opportunities can be immediately applied
into your own meeting practices
1. A FAST Meeting process
FAST Meetings is a 4 phase process and set of meeting tools that
guides the process of meetings. It harnesses a range of conversation
and decision making methods which deliver higher levels of engagement
and traction so that meeting outcomes lead to focussed action.
FAST is scalable across different types of meetings, functional
areas, projects and hierarchical levels.
FAST is easily learned and used by leaders of meetings so they
can quickly enhance learning, alignment and relationship building
required to drive more productive outcomes.
FAST Phases
F – Focus ; the purpose, central issue and agreed outcomes
to be achieved
A – Awareness ; the knowledge, perceptions and data relating
to the issue
S – Solution ; the opportunities, options, and strategies
to move forward
T – Traction ; plans for follow through & implementation,
evaluation and review
The FAST process guides leaders to get F - focus in their meetings,
through framing of the meeting purpose, and the people who are
present.
Whilst current meeting practice already includes a Focus phase,
this often done regarding the content to be discussed, but not
the process to be used. For example, without a process of hearing
from all participants early on, the meeting dynamic is established
that not everyone will get a turn.
Interactive Focus methods such as Stand Out and Taking Turns inject
energy and provide constructive approaches to discussion from the
outset.
A - Awareness is then facilitated through the use of interactive
conversation methods, such as Business Cafe', Open Space, Dialogue
and Art Gallery. These speed up information sharing, and help groups
cut through more quickly to key issues and root causes of problems
as the Current Reality is comprehensively explored.
The S-Solution phase encourages synthesis into concrete, coherent
solutions. Transparent decision making methods such as The Great
Wall and Support Cycle help people maximise ownership and consensus,
to ensure widespread commitment. Solutions are agreed well before
the end of the meeting, so there is time to reflect on the activities
required to implement.
Implementation and commitment to action are clarified in the T-Traction
phase. Strategies and priorities are clarified in detail using
tools such as The Wheel of Commitment, Traction Cafe', and FAST
Action. These harness the engagement and traction already developed
during the meeting process, ensuring that actions are not only
planned, but also road tested across the group and translated into
individual commitments.
The FAST Meeting process is not rocket science. It provides a
simple process that all meeting participants can follow. This avoids
the current situation in most meetings where the process of discussing
agenda items is a random flow between these 4 phases without a
clear pathway, leading to 'drift', time wasting, disengagement
and rushed decision making at the end of meetings.
B. Deliver Value Adding Outcomes with RLA
Face to face meetings are expensive investments relative to other
forms of electronic communication such as email and phone. Therefore,
meetings must deliver higher value outcomes that can only be
achieved through face to face encounters.
Three high value outcomes form the basis of the RLA model. These
outcomes include..
Relationships - networking, stakeholder 'buy-in', team work,
trust & knowing
others better
Learning - knowledge sharing, insight, understanding, awareness & sustainable
problem solving
Alignment - decision making, strategies, consensus, priorities & commitment
Currently, many meetings set out to achieve predominantly one
of these. For example, some meetings are established as networking
events. Others such as project updates may have a learning orientation
whilst many that are geared toward decision making are alignment
oriented.
However, this one dimensional focus achieves only partial delivery
with the other 2 outcomes. For example, in the pursuit of decision
making, many meetings are not effective in building relationships,
nor do they often maximise the learning and insight that occurs
prior to decisions being made.
Productive meetings using effective process consistently deliver
RLA outcomes simultaneously. These enable alignment to emerge as
a result of effective decision making, whilst also facilitating
relationship building and generating valuable learning.
The end result of RLA outcomes are higher levels of engagement,
ownership and follow through of meetings. Consequently, meetings
are able to deliver more value. The increased effectiveness moves
beyond the boundaries of the meeting room to positively impact
the broader business performance.
Plug the $3 Million Cost Hole
By developing the process of meetings and staying focussed on higher
value outcomes, meeting productivity can be quickly improved.
This will increase the 'strike rate' of good meetings, and turn
a $ 3 Million cost hole into a significant surplus, through the
increased value generated.
| Table 2; Calculating the Total Direct Costs of Employee
Time in Meetings |
|
| NB; Calculate the average value of an employee's time, multiply
by the total time spent in meetings each year and your number
of staff. |
|
the average hourly value per employee;
($ 65,000 ÷ 1920 hours per annum) |
$ 35.00 per hour |
|
x |
number of meetings/ person/ year:
(4 hrs per week x 48 wks) |
192 |
|
x |
number of staff
(say 1000) |
1000 |
|
= |
Total cost per annum |
$ 6,720,000.00 |
______________________________
by David Pointon - FAST Meetings
FAST Meetings provides 3 levels of service to support improved
effectiveness, and implementation of Process Improvements; ranging
from Meeting by Design to transferring skills to your leaders through
FAST Facilitation DIY
|